The Best Software to Design a Zine
From free and open-source to industry standard — the page-layout tools for making a zine, and which one fits how you work.
So you want to make a zine and you've hit the question that stalls everyone before page one: what do I actually lay this thing out in? The honest answer depends on two things — how much you already know about page-layout software, and whether you ever plan to send a press-ready PDF to a real printer. A zine is mostly text frames, image boxes, and consistent margins repeated across spreads. That is a layout job, and layout tools handle it far better than image editors or drawing apps pressed into service.
The field splits cleanly. There's the free-and-open option (Scribus), the affordable one-time-purchase challenger (Affinity Publisher), the rented industry standard (InDesign), the browser drag-and-drop crowd-pleaser (Canva), and the interface-design tool people keep using anyway (Figma). Each gets you to a finished zine; they just disagree about how much pain, money, and print-readiness sit between you and the staple gun. Below: learning curve, what comes out the other end, and what it costs.
At a glance
| Tool | Rating | Best for | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Affinity Publisher | ★★★★★4.7 | Self-publishers who want pro output without renting | One-time licence, no subscription (occasional sales) | Visit ↗ |
| Adobe InDesign | ★★★★★4.4 | Pros and anyone handing files to studios or printers | Subscription only, monthly or annual (Adobe CC) | Visit ↗ |
| Canva | ★★★★★3.8 | Beginners and quick, simple zine layouts | Free tier; paid plan adds assets and export options | Visit ↗ |
| Scribus | ★★★★★4.1 | Budget-conscious makers who want real print output | Free and open-source, forever | Visit ↗ |
| Figma | ★★★★★3.2 | Screen-only zines and roughing out layout ideas | Free tier; paid plans for teams | Visit ↗ |
01. Affinity Publisher
★★★★★4.7Real print layout, one price, no subscription strings attached
- Best for
- Self-publishers who want pro output without renting
- Price
- One-time licence, no subscription (occasional sales)
This is the sweet spot for most zinesters. Affinity Publisher does the grown-up layout work — facing pages, master pages, CMYK, bleed, embedded fonts, clean PDF/X export — and you pay once and keep it. No monthly bleed from your account. The interface will feel familiar to anyone who's touched InDesign, and the learning curve is reasonable for a beginner willing to watch a few tutorials.
Its party trick is StudioLink, which lets you jump into Affinity's photo and vector tools inside the same file without exporting. Handy when your zine mixes type, illustration and photos. It's not flawless: long-document features and scripting lag behind InDesign, and the ecosystem of plugins and templates is thinner. But for a zine, you'll rarely hit those walls.
For
- One-time purchase, you own it
- Genuine CMYK and press-ready PDF
- Familiar, learnable interface
- Full iPad version included
Against
- Fewer plugins and templates than Adobe
- Long-document tools less mature
- Not the studio-standard for handoff
02. Adobe InDesign
★★★★★4.4The studio standard, rented monthly, overkill for one zine
- Best for
- Pros and anyone handing files to studios or printers
- Price
- Subscription only, monthly or annual (Adobe CC)
InDesign is what the industry actually uses, and it shows. Typographic control is the deepest here, long-document features are unmatched, and most print shops and design studios expect native .indd files. If you're building a career in design or collaborating with people already in Adobe's orbit, this is the tool to know.
The cost model is the sticking point. It's subscription only — stop paying and you lose access, and the files don't open cleanly elsewhere. For a single zine that's a lot of overhead. The app is also dense; expect a real learning investment before you're fast. But the payoff is precision, reliability at the printer, and skills that are universally recognised. Worth it if you'll use it often; questionable if it's a one-off.
For
- Deepest typography and layout control
- Industry-standard file handoff
- Excellent long-document tools
- Huge tutorial and plugin ecosystem
Against
- Subscription only, no buyout
- Steeper learning curve
- Lock-in: files don't open elsewhere
03. Canva
★★★★★3.8Fast, friendly, browser-based — fine for a first zine
- Best for
- Beginners and quick, simple zine layouts
- Price
- Free tier; paid plan adds assets and export options
Canva gets you from nothing to a printable spread faster than anything else here, and the free tier covers a lot. Drag-and-drop templates, a big asset library, and an interface anyone can use in ten minutes. For a first zine, a quick photocopied one, or a collage-style piece, it's genuinely useful and unintimidating.
The limits show up at the printer. Precise typographic and layout control is shallow, and while Canva can export a print PDF with bleed, you get less command over CMYK and trim than a real layout tool — proof a copy before you commit to a run. Check the licensing on stock elements too, especially for anything you sell. It's a starting point, not a forever home, but it's an honest one. Don't dismiss it just because it's easy.
For
- Almost no learning curve
- Generous free tier
- Big template and asset library
- Works in the browser, anywhere
Against
- Limited print/CMYK control
- Shallow typographic precision
- Check stock-asset licensing before selling
04. Scribus
★★★★★4.1Free, open-source, and genuinely print-ready if you're patient
- Best for
- Budget-conscious makers who want real print output
- Price
- Free and open-source, forever
Don't sleep on Scribus because it's free. It produces real press-ready PDF/X with master pages, CMYK, spot colours and proper bleed — the actual things a printer needs — and it costs nothing, ever. Published books and zines have come straight out of it. For a self-publisher counting pennies, it's the most honest recommendation on this list.
The cost is paid in patience. The interface looks dated and works unintuitively; text handling is clumsier than the paid apps, and you'll hit small frustrations that a tutorial search usually solves. There's no slick template ecosystem holding your hand. But push through the learning curve and the output is professional-grade. If you'd rather spend time than money, this is the tool. Pair it with GIMP and Inkscape and you've got a full free pipeline.
For
- Completely free and open-source
- Real CMYK and PDF/X export
- Master pages and spot colours
- No subscription or lock-in
Against
- Dated, unintuitive interface
- Clumsier text handling
- Steeper, less-supported learning curve
05. Figma
★★★★★3.2Great for screens, not a real print-layout tool
- Best for
- Screen-only zines and roughing out layout ideas
- Price
- Free tier; paid plans for teams
Figma is an interface-design tool, and people keep using it for zines because it's free to start, collaborative, and pleasant to lay things out in. For a screen-only zine, a quick mockup, or sketching spreads before you move to a print tool, it's fine — even nice. Real-time collaboration is a genuine edge if you're making something with friends.
But be clear-eyed: it isn't built for print. No native CMYK, no proper bleed or crop marks, no PDF/X export, and multi-page print documents aren't its thing. You can wrangle a PDF out of it, but you'll fight colour and trim, and a fussy printer may reject the result. Use it as a staging ground, then rebuild in Affinity, InDesign or Scribus for the actual run. Don't make it your final destination for anything going to paper.
For
- Free tier, easy to start
- Excellent real-time collaboration
- Pleasant, fast layout interface
- Good for screen-only zines
Against
- No real CMYK or PDF/X
- Not built for print output
- Multi-page print is a workaround
The verdict
For most people making a zine, Affinity Publisher is the pick: it does real CMYK, bleeds, master pages and clean PDF export, costs one flat fee, and you own it forever. That combination is hard to beat for a self-publisher who doesn't want a subscription.
If money is the constraint, Scribus is the best free option, full stop — it produces genuine print-ready PDF/X files and asks nothing but patience. Adobe InDesign is the right call if you collaborate with print shops or studios that expect native files, or you're building a portfolio for industry work. Canva is best for a first zine, a fast risograph one-pager, or anyone allergic to software, as long as you proof the export before printing.
Figma is a fine staging ground for layout ideas and screen-only zines, but it isn't a print tool — don't make it your final destination. Pick by where the file ends up, not by which logo you recognise.
Questions
Do I really need layout software, or can I just use Photoshop or Word?
You can, but you'll fight the tool. Word has no real control over bleed, CMYK, or press-ready PDF, and it reflows your careful spreads without asking. Photoshop builds everything as flattened pixels, so text prints soft and files balloon. Dedicated layout apps keep text sharp as vectors, let you set facing pages and margins once, and export the file a printer actually wants. For anything past a couple of folded pages, it saves real grief.
What does my printer actually need from the file?
Usually a PDF with bleed (artwork running a few millimetres past the trim edge), crop marks, fonts embedded, and images around 300dpi. Colour zines generally want CMYK; risograph and some digital printers prefer specific spot or greyscale setups, so ask first. Scribus, Affinity Publisher and InDesign all export this properly. Canva can produce a print PDF with bleed but gives you less control, and Figma needs help. When in doubt, send the printer a test file early.
Is Scribus genuinely good enough, or just good for free?
Genuinely good enough for a zine. It does master pages, CMYK, spot colours and proper PDF/X export — the things that matter at the printer. The catch is the interface, which feels dated and unintuitive, and text handling that's clumsier than the paid tools. You'll spend more time learning and more time fiddling. But the output is real, professional print-ready PDF, and plenty of published zines and books have come out of it. Budget patience instead of money.
Affinity Publisher or InDesign — which should a beginner learn?
For a beginner with no industry obligation, Affinity Publisher. It covers the same core ground — master pages, CMYK, bleed, clean export — for a single one-time price instead of a monthly subscription, and the interface is a touch friendlier. Learn InDesign if you're heading into design work professionally, need to open or hand off native .indd files, or your collaborators all live in Adobe. The skills transfer reasonably well between them, so starting on Affinity won't strand you later.
Can I design a zine on my phone or tablet?
Partly. Canva's mobile and tablet apps are surprisingly capable for simple layouts and quick edits. Affinity Publisher has a full iPad version that's genuinely powerful. InDesign is desktop-first with limited mobile support. Scribus is desktop only. For serious multi-page layout work you'll still want a proper screen, keyboard and the precision a mouse or stylus gives you — but roughing out a short zine on a tablet is doable, especially in Canva or Affinity for iPad.
More guides
All guides →The Best Print-on-Demand Services for Zines & Art Books
Six print-on-demand presses compared for small-run zines, photo books and art books — on quality, formats, minimums and price.
The Best AI Tools for Generative Art & Image Books
The image and design tools worth paying for if you make generative, AI-assisted publications — ranked on control, licensing and output.
The Best Online Courses for Book & Editorial Design
Where to actually learn typography, layout and book design online — Domestika, Skillshare, MasterClass and Coursera, compared honestly.